1. Introduction
When we talk
about shareholders, we refer to individuals or entities that have invested in a
company through share ownership. In actual fact, they are the
owners of the company and are interested in long-term success.
Shareholders get involved in the company that they have invested in for the
purpose of protecting their investment and also to promote good governance.
Their involvement pushes the board of directors to act in the best interests of
shareholders thus protecting their investment from mismanagement.
When it comes to
protecting their investment, the shareholders do so through monitoring
performance, holding the management accountable for financial and operational
performance. Shareholders are critical
to corporate governance since they elect directors, approve corporate actions
as well as influence strategic directions of the business. Corporate governance
is about a system of rules, practices and procedures through which a company is
directed and controlled. Through
corporate governance the interests of all stakeholders are taken into account.
Shareholders are able to influence corporate strategy through voting on key
matters. They also promote good governance by encouraging transparency, ethical
conduct and compliance with relevant laws, procedures and governance.
Strong corporate
governance is not just a legal or ethical requirement but a strategic advantage
that provides structures through which a company’s objectives are set and
achieved while at the same time ensure that risk is monitored, assessed and
managed. Through active oversight the risk of fraud, corruption or reckless
decisions that may harm the ratings of the company can be reduced. The role of
shareholder, particularly as they become more diverse and vocal, is integral to
shaping governance. Companies that understand and actively engage with
different types of shareholders are better positioned to navigate complexity,
maintain trust, and achieve long term success.
Active shareholders are able to shift the company focus from short-term
profits to sustainable long-term success.
Where
shareholders are able to push companies to act responsibly, the performance and
values increase. On issues of climate
change, diversity and human rights, shareholders with shared interests may
collaborate to push/influence strategic, operational or governance changes. Companies
that support environmental, social and governance (ESG) goals are rated highly
which creates long-term value increasing the company’s reputation. A healthy
balance between ownership and oversight is necessary for long-term business
success. The big question is: ‘are our
shareholders engaged and empowered?’.
2. Engaged and Empowered shareholders
a. Engagement refers to involvement, commitment, or
active participation in an event or process. It involves emotional and mental
connection in the subject matter. Shareholder engagement will involve active
dialogue and interaction. As such, one
would like to find out how well shareholders are engaged in the investment that
they have made. Engaged shareholders are able to communicate and interact with
the company to ensure that their interests are represented. Effective
shareholder engagement varies from voting to informal methods such as dialogue.
During annual general meetings (AGMs) and extraordinary general meetings
(EGMs), shareholders vote on key issues and also ask questions directly to the
board. They are also able to voice their concerns which influence policy.
Shareholders stay engaged by reviewing financial
statements and also evaluating ESG (ESG) reports. Digital platforms are being
used to enable easy voting, sending updates and hosting virtual meetings.
Participating in investor relations activities such as roadshows and webinars
gives shareholders updates and a chance to ask questions.
b. Empowerment means equipping people with authority,
confidence and resources that enable them act independently taking control of
their own lives and decisions. Empowered shareholders actively participate in
the governance and decision making for the betterment of their investment. Empowered
shareholders have greater rights, tools and influence to actively participate
in the company. They understand the company’s performance, risks and governance
structures enabling them to have a real say on how a company is run in addition
to owning shares. They are able to use their power to effect change through
thoughtful voting at shareholders’ meetings. Some of the tools that empower
shareholders include legal, financial and governance. They make buy/sell
decisions based on corporate governance and values which give them exit options
by selling or selling their shares to signal their dissatisfaction or
satisfaction. This is an economic tool that affects the share price and send a
warning message to the management.
Tools that empower
shareholder |
Empowerment Ability: |
Voting rights |
Decide on key issues
by voting |
AGMs |
Interact with board
and present concerns |
Proxy voting |
Vote without being
present offers a lot of flexibility in decision making |
Shareholder proposal
|
Suggest and pushes
for reforms or changes |
Right to information |
Make informed
decisions through access to data |
Legal action |
Enforce rights
through a court of law |
Shareholder
agreements |
Agreements regarding
board representation and special voting rights or protection |
Collaborative
activism |
Amplify influence by
working together to apply pressure on management |
Exit (selling
shares) |
Send financial
signal as an economic tool that signals dissatisfaction |
Investor engagement |
Maintain open
dialogue and updates where concerns are expressed directly |
Empowerment
of shareholders involves strong voting rights that allow shareholders to elect
or remove board members. The shareholders should also be able to propose
resolutions at annual meetings. The resolutions may address disclosure,
transparency and board structure among others. Shareholder empowerment is
strengthened through access to accurate, timely and comprehensive data. This
facilitates shareholders to make informed decisions and hold the management
accountable. Empowered shareholders can engage or are confrontational demanding
for improved governance or replace underperforming directors. Shareholder empowerment ensures that:
·
Boards and management
remain answerable to investors
·
Governance standards,
transparency and ethical behaviour are high
·
Ensures that
management align with the long-term goals
·
Reduce risk of fraud
and mismanagement
c. The connection between shareholder engagement and
empowerment: Shareholder engagement is
related to their involvement in the activities of the company that they have
invested. While shareholder empowerment is giving the shareholder ownership and
autonomy to independently influence and direct the company. Empowerment often
builds on the engagement where shareholders are able to join meetings and
contribute ideas freely. When
shareholders are informed and involved, they are more likely to feel confident
and are more prepared for empowerment.
3. The capacity of shareholders
Corporate
governance can be influenced by the capacity of the shareholder. For our
purpose, the term capacity refers to the type, size and power. The interest of
the majority shareholders can influence strategy and to an extent dominate
governance decisions.
Types of shareholders |
Influence in governance matters |
Focus |
1. Institutional Shareholders: - they invest large sums of money into
corporations. They have significant
influence due to the volume of their holding. They are active in corporate
governance matters. |
·
Have a high bargaining power ·
Can access management easily ·
Have a strong advocacy for
corporate performance and ESG (Environmental, social and Governance) |
·
Would push for improvement in
disclosure and better environmental or social practices |
2. Retail (Individual) shareholders: - refers to individuals who purchase
stoke in small quantities. |
·
Collectively, they represent a
large portion that has a great bargaining power ·
They have limited influence in
governance ·
They are reactive to market
fluctuations |
·
Are usually passive. They only
became vocal when there is a crises or scandals. |
3. Founder and promoter shareholder- This group is made up of individuals
who originally started the company or have had a significant role in
establishment of the company. |
·
They hold board positions as
such they have a strong influence over the decisions of the company |
·
May cause governance conflicts
due to resistance to change in an effort to maintain control of the company. |
4. Employee shareholders: - the hold shares though employee stock
ownership plans (ESOPs). The ownership structure is designed to align
employees’ interests with those of other shareholders. |
·
They are motivated to improve
company performance ·
May lack influence at governance
level. |
·
Contribute towards a more engaged
workforce |
4. Shareholders influence governance
Shareholders
influence governance directly or indirectly. The direct methods that influence
governance have been discussed earlier on and include: voting rights, resolutions
and fiduciary influence. Shareholders are able to do so if engaged and
empowered. Shareholders influence governance indirectly through actions that
shape behaviour, policy or decision making. These
indirect methods include: -
a) Buy/sell decisions: a large sell-off due to governance
can drop share price affecting investor confidence. Through financial
consequence, the boards are pressured to act.
b) Dialogue: investor concerns communicated to the
management and board members may bring about reforms that are meant to maintain
investor confidence. This would avoid public disputes and influence trust.
c) Public pressure: where investors speak publicly in
matters relating governance can lead to reputational risk. This collective
action may prompt governance reforms.
d) Investor Coalitions: shared principles urging
transparency may pressure the board to align with best practices.
e) Ratings: evaluations are used to rate the
effectiveness of a board. Poor ratings encourage a board to adjust policies in
order to maintain favourable ratings and investor interest.
f) Support for like-minded Board Members: supporting a
reform-minded board candidate in a contested election signals governance
direction. This helps shape board composition and direction
5. Case Study: Unilever Shareholders 2018
a. Background: Unilever is a multinational company
whose headquarter is in London, United Kingdom. It operates in more than 190
countries where it owns over 400 brands many of which are household names. In
2018, it announced intention to move its corporate base from the UK to the
Netherlands. The aim was to simplify operations, improve business agility and
make it easier to merge with other companies. The decisions implied that
Unilever would exit the London’s Stock Exchange. Shareholder concerns was that UK-shareholders
would lose power in corporate decisions. The
benefits of the move were not clearly explained to
the shareholders.
Shareholder
empowerment Tools used |
How it was implemented |
Voting Rights |
The restructuring proposal
required a 75% approval. Shareholders had to vote |
Engagement and
dialogue |
Large shareholders
voiced strong concerns to the board of Unilever |
Collaborative
Pressure |
Major institutional
investors publicly opposed the plan. |
Media and Public
Influence |
Shareholders raised
the issue in financial media to pressure the board of management |
Outcomes and lessons learnt |
|
·
The company admitted that it had
not received sufficient shareholder support. ·
The victory by shareholders shows
that even global giants must listen to their investors ·
Shareholders were able to stop
corporate change through collective action and use of voting power ·
Threat of losing investor trust
influenced the board’s decision ·
Transparent communication is
critical for major changes ·
Empowered shareholders have the
ability to influence ethical, environmental, strategic and structural
decisions. |
6. Conclusion
Shareholder engagement and empowerment is the cornerstone for modern day corporate governance. When shareholders have the right tools, protections, and access to information, they can drive companies to more transparent, ethical and sustainable. Engaged shareholders shape the direction, values and success of the company invested. By promoting shareholder empowerment, a company demonstrates commitment to ethical leadership, long-term value creation, and responsible corporate citizenship. Shareholder involvement leads to stronger governance, better decision making that results in better financial and social returns
CS Doris Ngugi is a Governance Practitioner and Curriculum Specialist. She holds a Master of Science in Entrepreneurship from Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT) and a Bachelor of Education (Business Studies, Economics and Education). Beyond that, she is an author of business Studies with Oxford University Press. As a Certified Public Secretary of Kenya has enabled her to work in various school boards where she carries out consultancies in the competency Based Curriculum (CBC). She has been able to develop syllabuses and Curriculum that includes review of KASNEB and ICPSK syllabuses. She has served in the Education and Professional Development Committee of ICPSK where her efforts were recognised through a commendation for her contribution in the profession of Certified Secretary. As the founder of Micro-Preneur Company Secretarial Support Limited, Doris specializes in matters governance and support for enterprises.